The Bond
of Love
By Eric Wilding
Who’s dat?" This is the
repeated question of my 1-year-old as she points at people and clutches her
favorite book, Who Am I? Meanwhile, my 3-year-old is constantly
asking her friends, "What are your mum and dad’s names?"
At a very young age, humans start
their quest to understand the identity of others and the relationships
between themselves and others.
It’s the same with trying to
understand God. As we get older, we want to know how God relates to us, but
also how the Persons of the Trinity relate to each other. It’s not hard for
us to get a handle on the idea of Father and Son, even though we know that
that relationship somehow transcends our human understanding of persons and
family relations.
|
The early church believed in one God, but the
relationships of the Father, Son and Spirit were not clear until the
fourth century.
|
For example, we see from the New
Testament that Jesus is our Brother, and through him we learn to call God
our Father or Abba (or Papa). With that, we might be tempted to think
that we have figured out our relationship with God. But then a third Person,
the Holy Spirit, drifts in, and exactly where he fits into these
relationships is a little like trying to nail down the wind. We know he is a
Person because he guides, hears, speaks (John 16:13), decides (Acts 15:28),
ordains (Acts 20:28); and he uses the personal pronouns "I" and "me" when he
speaks (Acts 10:19-20, 13:2).
Gregory of Nazianzen, a prominent
church Father who wrote in the mid-to-late fourth century, in describing the
biblical revelation of the triune God, wrote, "The Old Testament proclaimed
the Father openly, and the Son more obscurely. The New manifested the Son,
and suggested the Deity of the Spirit. Now the Spirit Himself dwells among
us, and supplies us with a clearer demonstration of Himself."1
The apostle Paul, in Ephesians
4:3-6, calls the Spirit "the bond of peace" who maintains unity in love
among believers and between them and God. In a way we cannot comprehend, the
Holy Spirit is the essence and presence of the Father and the Son with us.
In other words, the very love shared by the Father and the Son is a third
divine Person, eternally springing from their perfect union and communion,
distinct from them, yet one with them.
But the primary question
confronting the church in its first 300 years was "Who is Jesus?" The church
struggled with this question in the crucible of Roman persecution, pagan
worldviews, Greco-Roman philosophies and its own Jewish heritage. From its
earliest creeds, doxologies and baptismal formulas, it is clear that the
early church believed in one and only one God while acknowledging the
personhood and divinity of the Father, the Son and of the Holy Spirit.2
But exactly how to express the relationships between the Father, Son and
Spirit did not reach clarity until the fourth century.
Confronting the questions
In the early 300s, a priest of
Alexandria, Egypt, named Arius created a major controversy by popularizing
the idea that the Son was not divine in the same way as the Father, but was
instead crowned with divinity as the first and greatest creation of the
Father before all time. According to Arius, the Father first created the Son
as a unique and special creation, and then delegated the rest of creation to
him. At the Council of Nicea (a.d.
325), the church took up the controversy and ruled the teachings of Arius as
heretical. The council, consisting of bishops from all over the Empire,
dogmatically affirmed in what became known as the Creed of Nicea, that the
Son is not of a similar essence as the Father, as the followers of Arius
contended, but of the very same essence, or being, as the Father. The
council also included in the creed the statement, "We believe in the Holy
Spirit."
Later in the same century,
controversies arose over the divinity of the Holy Spirit. Certain groups,
disparagingly referred to as the Pneumatomachi (fighters against the
Spirit), taught that the Spirit was only the greatest creature, like an
angel, a power, or an instrument of God.
The church turned its attention to
the Holy Spirit in order to counteract these heresies by reflecting further
on Scripture in order to clarify and explain what the church had always
believed and experienced. Athanasius, the chief opponent of the heresies of
Arius, concluded that the Christian baptismal formula "in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" (Matthew 28:19) demonstrated
that the Spirit shared the same divine essence as the Father and the Son.
|
You're Included

Cherith Fee Nordling, of Antioch Leadership Network in Grand
Rapids, Michigan |

Dr. Gary Deddo, Senior Editor of Academic Publications at
InterVarsity Press |

Dr. Andrew Root, Assistant Professor of Youth and Family
Ministry at Luther Seminary |
"I have learned so
much from your
program. I can’t thank
you enough for it…"
—Kansas |
Watch at
YoureIncluded.org
Host J. Michael Feazell talks to leading
theologians, writers and pastors about life in Jesus Christ.
-
Shack author William P. Young
-
Ray Anderson, Fuller Theological Seminary
-
Elmer Colyer, University of Dubuque Theological
Seminary
-
Gary Deddo, InterVarsity Press
-
Roger Newell, George Fox University
-
Dr. Dan Thimell, Oral Roberts University
-
C. Baxter Kruger, Perichoresis
-
Chris Kettler, Friends University
-
Gerrit Dawson, First Presbyterian Church, Baton
Rouge
-
Jeff McSwain, Reality Ministries
-
John McKenna, World Mission University
and more…
Complete programs available free for viewing and
download at
www.youreincluded.org
|
Gregory of Nazianzus, a younger
contemporary of Athanasius, confirmed that the Holy Spirit must be God since
he does what only God can do, such as sanctify human beings. With Scripture
and the arguments of these and other great theologians, the Council of
Constantinople (a.d. 381)
affirmed that the Holy Spirit is "the Lord and life-giver, proceeding from
the Father, object of worship and the same glory with the Father and the
Son."
In each age of the church, the
full divinity of the Son and of the Spirit has been attacked from without
and within. These attacks force the church to explain, in its limited human
vocabulary, the mystery of the Triune God.
With us and for us
Paul says, "God’s love has been
poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit that has been given to
us" (Romans 5:5, NRSV). In Revelation 22:1-2, the water of life (an image of
the Spirit) flows from the throne of God and of the Lamb (an image of the
Son) toward the servants.
The Holy Spirit is the gift of God
in our lives (Acts 2:38-39). The Holy Spirit is the Giver who gives us his
gifts (1 Corinthians 12-13) and his fruit (Galatians 5:22-23). The fruit and
gifts go together to edify and unify the body of Christ. And the greatest
gift of the Spirit is the same as the first fruit of the Spirit: love.
As God is in eternal loving
relationship as Father, Son and Holy Spirit, so also he has made us to be in
loving relationship with him and one another. As the Holy Spirit unites the
divinity and humanity of Christ (Matthew 1:18, 20), so the Spirit also
unites us to the Son so that we are united with each other as the body of
Christ (1 Corinthians 12: 12-13).
Because Christ has taken humanity
into himself, we are partakers and participants in the divine nature with
him (Hebrews 2:14, 3:14, 6:4, 12:10; 2 Peter 1:4). Because we are in Christ,
because he is both the Son of God and the perfect human with us and for us
in our humanity, we share in his perfect relationship with the Father. In
Christ, we are the beloved children of the Father, in whom he is well
pleased. And because we are united with Christ in his humanity, we share in
the Trinity’s grace, love and communion (2 Corinthians 13:14).
The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of adoption
(Romans 8:15), who ministers to us our union with Christ, who is our
righteousness and our life. As Jesus’ brothers and sisters we are children
of the Father, and with Jesus, we stand in the Father’s eternal love,
calling him "Abba."
1
Gregory Nazianzen, Orations XXXI Theological
V, 26.
2
Stanley Burgess, The Holy Spirit: Ancient Christian
Traditions, p. 16.