|
| |
|
By Michael Morrison

|
The Gospel Revealed
a study of Galatians 1
aul
started several churches in the province of
Galatia and then moved on to other regions. Then he learned that some other
people had gone to Galatia and were teaching the people that the gospel involved
much more than Paul had told them. “Jesus is good,” they apparently said, “but
you need to go further. You need to obey the Law that God gave his people. Faith
is good, but you need the laws of Moses, too.”
Paul was furious! The people were meddling in
his territory, making false accusations about him, trying to hijack the work he
had done, and worst of all, leading the people away from Christ. Paul wrote a
letter[1]
to defend his ministry and to explain what the gospel is. It has much to teach
us today.
Introduction
Greek letters normally began by saying who wrote
the letter and the people it is being sent to. Paul modifies this pattern by
adding a lengthy comment about the basis of his authority: Paul, an apostle—sent
not from men nor by man, but by Jesus Christ and God the Father, who raised him
from the dead— (v. 1).[2]
Several times in this letter, Paul denies that
he was sent or authorized by other people, especially the apostles in Jerusalem.
Apparently his opponents said that the apostles had sent Paul on a mission, a
mission he supposedly had not finished, and the apostles had then sent more
people to tell the Galatians about their need to obey the law of Moses (cf. Acts
15:5). Paul says that they are mistaken: They might have been sent by
human authority, but he had divine authority for his mission.
The letter is being sent not only by Paul, but
also all the brothers with me—he has supporters, though the letter does
not name them, perhaps because the Galatians do not know them. To the
churches in Galatia: Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord
Jesus Christ (vv. 2-3). Greek letters usually began with charein, or
“greetings.” Paul modifies this by using a similar word, charis, “grace,”
and adding the Jewish greeting, “peace.”
In verse 1, he noted an action of the Father.
Here, he describes the work of Christ: who gave himself for our sins to
rescue us from the present evil age, according to the will of our God and Father
(v. 4). This is the gospel in a nutshell: Jesus has taken care of our sins
and rescued us, giving us a place in the age to come as children of God.
Paul will elaborate more on this later in his letter. Here he specifies that
this rescue is precisely what the Father wanted, and it is to his glory for
ever and ever. Amen.
An astonishing curse
Most Greek letters included a brief
prayer to the gods; Paul usually expands that by thanking God for the faith of
the readers and asking a blessing on them. But in this letter, Paul gives no
thanks—he begins abruptly and includes a curse instead of a blessing: I am
astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace
of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— (v. 6).
“Paul’s expression of amazement…was a common
expression of rebuke in Greek letters of his day…. The tone of rebuke pervades
the…letter from 1:6 to 4:12” (G. Walter Hansen, Galatians, 36, 35).
The readers may have been
astonished, too, because Paul is telling them that they are deserting God. That
is not what they want to do, but Paul is telling them that’s what it amounts to.
They had been called by grace, and if they give their allegiance to the law,
they will be denying their call (cf. 5:2). The opponents claimed that their
message was the original gospel, but Paul says that it is really no gospel at
all (1:7). It was bad news, not good. It was requiring elements of the old
age, the age that Jesus had rescued us from.
Evidently some people are
throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.
Paul then announces his curse: But
even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we
preached to you, let him be eternally condemned![3]
(v. 8). Paul is
not asking for personal loyalty—he wants the people to be loyal to the message
of Jesus Christ.
Paul is so insistent on this that he
repeats himself: As we have already
said, so now I say again: If[4]
anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be
eternally condemned!
(v. 9).
After this strongly worded outburst,
Paul asks, Am I now trying to win the
approval of men, or of God? Or am I trying to please men? If I were still[5]
trying to please men, I would not be a servant of Christ
(v. 10). His opponents apparently said that Paul focused on grace because he was
afraid of telling people about the laws of Moses. But as Paul has just
demonstrated, he is not afraid of offending people. He serves Christ, not public
opinion. He was commissioned by Christ, not human beings.
Paul’s commission from God
To support his point, and to show
that the opponents were not telling the truth, Paul tells his story,
particularly his relationship with the apostles. In the book of Acts, Luke tells
us many more details, but this is Paul’s own description of what happened.[6]
I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not something
that man made up (v. 11). Paul is here responding to his opponents.
I did not receive it from any
man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ
(v. 12). It was not just a revelation from Christ—it was Christ being
revealed to Paul (v. 16). Paul saw Christ, and that required a
re-evaluation of everything that Paul had believed. Based simply on that
appearance of Jesus, Paul could have understood quite a bit:
“Jesus has been resurrected into glory, so he
must be God’s Anointed, the Messiah. But I was persecuting his people! If zeal
for the law caused me to persecute God’s people, something must be seriously
wrong in my use of the law. Not only that, I was an enemy of God, and yet God
spared me—I was accepted by grace, not by careful observance of the law.[7]
And the Messiah did not bring political blessings, so the salvation that he
brought was a spiritual one—one available to Gentiles as well as Jews.”
But I am getting ahead of the story. Here’s the
way Paul tells it: For you have heard of my previous way of life in Judaism,
how intensely I persecuted the church of God and tried to destroy it (v.
13). They already knew the story, but Paul tells it here to highlight certain
facts, and to present himself as a model they could imitate. If someone had been
there, done that, and found it deficient, then maybe it would not be wise for
the Galatians to adopt a law-based approach to religion.
I was advancing in Judaism beyond many Jews
of my own age and was extremely zealous for the traditions of my fathers
(v. 14). Paul had viewed Judaism as a
“performance” religion, in which some people did better than others, and he did
particularly well. Following the example of Phineas, Elijah, and Mattathias, his
zeal for the law caused him to persecute people who were leading others astray
(see Num. 25:6-18; 1 Kings 19:10; and 1 Maccabees 2:23-26, 58).[8]
This is one of the ways in which he worked harder than other people his age.
According to their standards, he had everything going for him (see Phil. 3:4-6).
But he gave it up:
But when God, who set me apart from birth and
called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might
preach him among the Gentiles… (Gal.
1:15-16). The basic components of Paul’s calling are God’s grace, Jesus
Christ the Son of God in him[9],
and the mission to the Gentiles. Paul’s message had its origin in God, not in
the apostles.
I did not consult any man, nor did I go up to
Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately
into Arabia and later returned to Damascus
(v. 17). Paul spent several days with Ananias and the disciples in Damascus
(Acts 9:19), and they no doubt told him what they knew about Jesus. Paul’s point
is not that he didn’t talk to anyone, but that he did not ask anyone to
tell him what to preach. The opponents in Galatia may have been trained by
apostles, but Paul was not. And that’s good—the apostles did not yet know that
God was calling Gentiles into his family, and if they had heard Paul talk about
a Gentile mission, they probably would have tried to talk him out of it!
Paul does not tell us where in Arabia he went,
or what he did there. If he began to preach in Damascus, then he may have
preached in Arabia, too, perhaps in Nabatea, southeast of Judea. Jesus told him
to preach to the Gentiles, so he probably did.
Then after three years,[10]
I went up to Jerusalem to get acquainted with Peter and stayed with him fifteen
days (Gal. 1:18). Peter no doubt told
him as much as he could about Jesus, but it was not a training session in which
Peter told Paul what he should preach. Paul is stressing his independence.
I saw none of the other apostles—only James,
the Lord’s brother. I assure you before God that what I am writing you is no lie
(vv. 19-20). Paul’s insistence that he is not lying indicates that he is
responding to accusations—that he was an agent of the apostles. Paul’s opponents
claimed an equal authority, so they tried to “flesh out” Paul’s message with
more details. They have my story wrong, Paul says, and they have the gospel
wrong, too.
Paul explained that he left the area: Later I
went to Syria and Cilicia. I was personally unknown to the churches of Judea
that are in Christ (vv. 21-22). Antioch is the most likely location in
Syria, and Tarsus in Cilicia. Paul’s main point is that he did not stay in
Judea. Jesus had not sent him to Judea either to preach or to put himself under
the apostles’ authority.
Paul’s only relationship with the Judean
churches was that they heard about him: They only heard the report: “The man
who formerly persecuted us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.”
And they praised God because of me (vv. 23-24). So Paul abandoned his
pursuit of Jewish traditions, and began to preach another faith, the one we call
Christianity. The Judean Jewish Christians had not brought this about, but they
were in substantial agreement with Paul’s conversion and the faith that he
preached.
|
Questions for discussion
-
When God called me, was I aware that it was
by the grace of Christ? (v. 6).
-
Do I ever shirk from the gospel because I am
trying to please people? (v. 10)
-
Was there ever a point in my life when I
persecuted or belittled the gospel? (v. 13)
-
Does God reveal his Son in me? (v. 16)
-
Have I turned away from a law-based religion
to trust the grace of Christ?
|
|
Endnotes:
|
copyright 2007
 |
|