|
Dawkins’ God, reviewed by John Halford
ne thing I have learned is that you cannot prove God exists to someone who
is determined to believe he does not. No matter what proofs you offer, a
committed atheist will remain unconvinced. He might even use your evidence
against you and put a dent in your own faith.
We believers are often made to
feel that we are arguing from a position of weakness. Unless you can prove
that God exists, the only logical conclusion a rational person can arrive at
is that God doesn’t. Perhaps the most skillful exponent of this is Oxford
Professor Richard Dawkins—a world-renowned opponent of faith and religion.
|

McGrath shows that to deny
the existence and influence of a higher creative power takes
considerable faith. |
So brilliant is Dr. Dawkins’
reasoning, so eloquent his arguments, that even highly educated scholars
refuse to debate him. Not so Alister McGrath. Once an atheist himself,
McGrath is now one of Britain’s leading Christian scholars. In Dawkins’
God: Genes, Memes and the Meaning of Life, he tackles the logic for
atheism head on, and in fact, turns many of the arguments on their head.
McGrath has a Ph.D in molecular biology, is not intimidated with the jargon
and can easily deal with complex scientific ideas. The book is not "light
reading," but it is not difficult for the nonprofessional to grasp.
McGrath exposes atheism for
what it is. He shows that to deny the existence and influence of a higher
creative power, in the face of the evidence that science continues to
discover, takes considerable faith. The natural sciences and theology both
explore reality in their own ways. But no matter which direction you
approach, McGrath argues convincingly that atheism, far from being a logical
default position, is actually the least likely explanation.
Look for a discussion on this
subject with Alister McGrath in the next issue of Christian Odyssey.
In the meantime, I think you will enjoy Dawkins’ God.
Dawkins’ God: Gene, Memes
and the Meaning of Life, Alister McGrath (Blackwell Publishing,
2005). |